Direction  : Read the given passage carefully and answer the questions that follow. Certain words are printed in bold to help you locate them while answering some of these.
Meritocracy has become a leading social ideal. Politicians across the ideological spectrum continually return to the theme that the rewards of life – money, power, jobs, university admission – should be distributed according to skill and effort.
The most common metaphor is the “even playing field” upon which players can rise to the position that fits their merit.
 Conceptually and morally, meritocracy is presented as the opposite of systems such as hereditary aristocracy, in which one’s social position is determined by the lottery of birth. Under meritocracy, wealth and advantage are merit’s rightful compensation, not the fortuitous windfall of external events.
Most people don’t just think the world should be run meritocratically, they think it is meritocratic. In the United Kingdom, 84% of respondents to the 2009 British Social Attitudes survey stated that hard work is either “essential” or “very important” when it comes to getting ahead, and in 2016 the Brookings Institute found that 69% of Americans believe that people are rewarded for intelligence and skill. Respondents in both countries believe that external factors, such as luck and coming from a wealthy family, are much less important. While these ideas are most pronounced in these two countries, they are popular across the globe.
Although widely held, the belief that merit rather than luck determines success or failure in the world is demonstrably false.
 This is not least because merit itself is, in large part, the result of luck. Talent and the capacity for determined effort, sometimes called “grit”, depend a great deal on one’s genetic endowments and upbringing.
This is to say nothing of the fortuitous circumstances that figure into every success story. In his 2016 book Success and Luck, the US economist Robert Frank recounts the long-shots and coincidences that led to Bill Gates’s stellar rise as Microsoft’s founder, as well as to Frank’s own success as an academic. Luck intervenes by granting people merit, and again by furnishing circumstances in which merit can translate into success.

Q:

What ideas does the author refer to when he/she says, “While these ideas are most pronounced in these two countries, they are popular across the globe.”?

• 1
  Skills and efforts alone can lead to success.
• 2
  Luck and inheritance grant merit and favourable conditions leading to success.
• 3
  Merit can lead to success only if you are a resident of UK or America.
• 4
  External efforts like inheritance and luck do not affect the chance of being rich.
• 5
  Both A & D