Statement: 

Should India have no military force at all? 

Arguments 

I. No, Other countries in the world do not believe in nonviolence 

II. Yes, Many Indians believe in non - violence. 

Statement 

Should India encourage exports, when most things are insufficient for internal use itself? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, we have to earn foreign exchange to pay for our imports. 

II. No, even selective encouragement would lead to shortages. 

Statement 

Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in future?

Arguments

I. No, there is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle. 

II. Yes, this will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due unforeseen circumstances. 

Statement 

Should high chimneys be installed in industries? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, it reduces pollution at ground level. 

II. No, it increases pollution in upper atmosphere. 

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement :
 Should new big industries be started in Mumbai?
 Arguments:
 I. Yes, it will create job opportunities.
 II. No, it will further add to the pollution of the city.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( C ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement : 
 Should the oil companies be allowed to fix the price of petroleum products depending on market conditions?
 Arguments: 
 I. Yes, this is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable.
 II. No, this will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( C ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement: 
 Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?
 Arguments:
 I. Yes, trappers are making a lot of money.
 II. No, bans on hunting and trapping are not effective. 

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
 Give answer
 ( a ) if only argument I is strong.
 ( b ) if only argument II is strong. 
 ( C ) if either I or II is strong.
 ( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
 ( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement 
Should all the practicing doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?
Arguments:
I. No, How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
II. Yes, despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.