A situation is given, followed by two conclusions I and II. Read the situation and both the conclusions carefully and select the correct answer.
 Situation: Since the past 15 years, 75% of the products in the world’s pottery market comes from Country K. However, the employment in the pottery industry of Country K has been consistently declining by 5-9% every year since the past 3 years.

Direction: In the following questions, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the two conclusions I and II given them is/are definitely follow.

Statement: P ≤ Q < S = T ≥ U ≥ W < Z

Conclusion:

I. S > W

II. W = T

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement :
 Should new big industries be started in Mumbai?
 Arguments:
 I. Yes, it will create job opportunities.
 II. No, it will further add to the pollution of the city.

Direction: - In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.

Given answer

( a ) If only assumption I is implicit.

( b ) If only assumption II is implicit.

( c ) Either I or II is implicit.

( d ) If neither I nor II is implicit.

( e ) If both I and II are implicit. 

Statement: -

A warning in a train compartment –“To stop train, pull chain. Penalty for improper use Rs. 500.”

Assumptions

 I. Some people misuse the alarm chain.

II. On certain occasions, people may want to stop a running train.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( C ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement : 
 Should the oil companies be allowed to fix the price of petroleum products depending on market conditions?
 Arguments: 
 I. Yes, this is the only way to make the oil companies commercially viable.
 II. No, this will put additional burden on the retail prices of essential commodities and will cause a lot of hardships to the masses

Statement: 

Should words like 'Smoking is injurious to health' essentially appear on cigarette packs? 

Arguments: 

I. Yes, it is a sort of brain wash to make the smokers realize that they are inhaling poisonous stuff. 

II. No, It hampers the enjoyment of smoking 

Consider the given statement(s) and decide which of the given assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
"Tomorrow morning the hockey team will report by 9.00 am instead of 8:00 am for practise" said the coach.
Assumptions:
I. That day coach had some other work at 8:00 am.
II. They usually assemble for practice.

Given below are two statements. Take these to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions that follow and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. 

 Statements: 

All sweets are biscuits. 

All biscuits are cakes.

Conclusions:

1. All cakes are biscuits.

2. All sweets are cakes.