The statements below are followed by two conclusions labelled I and II. Assuming that the information in the statement is true, even if it appears to be variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements.
Statement 1 : All shells are skins.
Statement 2 : No skins are cats.
Conclusion I : No shells are cats.
Conclusion II : Some skins are shells.

In the question given below , two statements are given followed by four Conclusion I, II, III and IV.You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts .You have to decide which of the given conclusion , if any , follow from the given statements. 

Statements
All goats are tigers.
All tigers are lions.
Conclusions :
I. All tigers are goats
II. All lions are tigers
III. No goat is a lion
IV. No lion is a goat 

Direction: - In the following question, a statement is given followed by two courses of Action. A course of Action is taken for improvement, follow up etc. Read the statement carefully and give answer -
1. If only Course of Action I follow.
2. If only Course of Action II follows.
3. If either Course of Action I or II follows.
4. If neither Course of Action I nor II follows.
5. If both Course of Action I and II follow.

Statement: 
The police department has come under a cloud with recent revelations that at least two senior police officials are suspected to have been involved in the illegal sale of a large quantity of weapons from the state police armory.
Course of Action - 
I. A through investigation should be ordered by the State Government to bring out all those who are involved into the illegal sale of arms.
II. State police armory should be kept under the Central Government's control. 

Statement:

The organization should promote employees on the basis of merit alone and not on the basis of length of services or seniority.

Assumptions

I. Length of service or seniority does not alone reflect merit of an employee.

II. It is possible to determine and measure merit of an employee.

Direction : Following question consists of six statements followed by five conclusions. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions does not logically follow from the given statements using all statements together. 

Statements: All moon are star.
All star are light.
Some light are stone.
Some stone is blue.
No blue is kite.
All kite are machine.
Conclusions:
(A) All moon being stone is a possibility.
(B) All moon being blue is a possibility.
(C) Some stone are not kite.
(D) All blue being machine is a possibility.
(E) All stone being kite is a possibility.

Read the statements and select a conclusion from the given alternatives: 

Statements: 
Some owls are ostriches.
Some ostriches are crows.
Some crows are black.
Conclusion: 
1. Some owls are black.
2. No ostrich is black.
3. No owl is black.
4. Some ostriches are black. 

What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?
India, a member of the WTO, is but of course bound by its agreements and conventions. Article 6 of the Agreement on Agriculture, dealing with the provision of the Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) for the agricultural products, is considered to be trade distorting. It is also subjected to various limitations, one of them being the fact that the subsidy arising from ‘minimal supports’ cannot exceed 10 per cent of the value of agricultural production for developing countries. The PDS system in India adheres to the provision of the MSPs and is also involved in the stockholding of the food grains. It is contemplated that in the coming years the subsidy given to the producers will exceed 10 percent of the value of agricultural production.

What is the most crucial message conveyed in the passage?

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( c ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both argument I and II are strong.

Statement: 
Should fashionable dresses be banned?
Arguments: 
I. Yes, fashions keep changing and hence consumption of cloth increases.
II. No, fashionable clothes are a person's self-expression and therefore his / her fundamental right.