Extensive use of pesticides in agricultural production contaminates soil and water, remain in the crops and finally enter food chain, thereby posing threat to the human beings.
Inference:
I. Excessive use of pesticides in agricultural production is not good for people.
II. Excessive use of pesticides in agricultural production can have a bad effect on water.
Direction : In each of the questions below are given some statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
(a) If only conclusion I follows.
(b) If only conclusion II follows.
(c) If either conclusion I or II follows.
(d) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
(e) If both conclusions I and II follow.
Statements: Z<X<C≤V;
B>C<G<H≤J
Conclusion:
I: Z<G
II: X<J
Direction: In these questions, relationship between different elements is shown in the statements. These statements are followed by two conclusions.
Mark answer
A) If only conclusion I follows.
B) If only conclusion II follows.
C) If either conclusion I or II follows.
D) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
E) If both conclusions I and II follow.
Statements: P > Q, S < T, X = Y, X > Z
Conclusions: I. S = Q II. X > Q
Three statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some dogs are animals.
Some animals are pet.
All pets are white.
Conclusions:
I. Some dogs are white.
II. Some animals are white.
III. Some animals are dogs.
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some Z are X.
II. Some W are Z.
Conclusions:
I. Some X are not W.
II. Some X are not Z.
Directions: In the following questions, the symbols @, #, $, % and & are used with the following meaning as illustrated below-
‘P@Q’ means ‘P is neither smaller than nor equal to Q ’
‘P#Q’ means ‘P is neither greater than nor equal to Q'
‘P$Q’ means ‘P is neither smaller than nor greater than Q’
‘P%Q’ means ‘P is not greater than Q’
‘P&Q’ means ‘P is not smaller than Q’
Now in each of the following questions assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the three conclusions
I, II and III given below them is/are definitely true and give your answer accordingly.
Statement: N#M&L; L#J&O; O&V
Conclusions:
I. M@N
II. J#V
III. L%N
Direction : Following question consists of six statements followed by five conclusions. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions does not logically follow from the given statements using all statements together.
Statements: All street are green.
Some green are city.
All city are tree.
No city is Lion.
All mobile are lion.
Some mobile are network.
Conclusions:
(A) Some tree are green
(B) Some network are lion
(C) Some tree are not lion
(D) Some green are not lion
(E) Some Street are city