In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 I. All A are H.
 II. No B is A.

Conclusion:
 I. Some A are not B.
 II. No B is H.

Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:

I. No A is B.

II. All C are D.

III. Some C are B.

Conclusions:

I. Some D are B.

II. Some B are C.

Two statements are given, followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

Statements:
 No fish is a pen.
 All keys are pens.

Conclusions:
 I. No key is a pen.
 II. No pen is a key.
 III. Some pens are keys.
 IV. Some keys are fishes.

Directions: In each question below are given two/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: 

Some chair is table.
 Some bed is table.
 No furniture is bed.

Conclusions:

I. some table is not furniture.
 II. All table being furniture is a possibility.

Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.

Statement I: Classical Indian logicians (Naiyāyikas) define Upamāna (Comparison) as the cognition of the new object through similarity, known by another means of cognition. 

Statement II: Naiyāyikas consider upamāna as a type of inductive reasoning and therefore view it as a type of inference (anumāna) only. 

Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:

Some beds are sofas.

Some sofas are chairs.

All chairs are books.

Conclusions:

I. Some beds are chairs.

II. Some sofas are books.

In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.

Statements:
 I. All pencil are pen.
 II. Some pen are rubber.

Conclusion:
 I. All rubber are pencil.
 II. Some pen are not pencil.
 III. Some rubber are not pen.

Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s).
 Statements:
 Some stones are cubes.
 No cube is a glass.
 All bats are cubes.
 Conclusions:
 I. Some stones being bats is a possibility.
 II. No bat is a glass.
 III. All cubes are bats.
 IV. No stone is a glass.