In this question, a statement is followed by two courses of action, numbered I and II. You must assume everything in the statement to be true and on the basis of the information given in the statement, decide which course of action/s logically follows for pursuing.

 Statement:
 A large number of the people of the city are diagnosed to be suffering from Malaria disease.

Course of Action:
 I. The city municipal authorities should take immediate steps to carry out extensive fumigation in the city.
 II. The people in the area should be advised to take steps to avoid mosquito bites.

Statement - Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.

Conclusion - I. Quality of education in India would improve soon

                       II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education

Assume following statement is true. On the basis of statement decide which of the courses of action logically follows it.

Statement:
 People residing in some tribal areas are far from education.

Courses of action:
 I. A mass awareness programme must be initiated in these areas.
 II. Social workers should be entrusted to educate them.

A question is given, followed by two statements numbered (I) and (II). You have to decide whether the data provided in the statements is sufficient to answer the question. Read both the statements and select the appropriate answer.
 Question: How many people are standing in the row where all people are facing north?
Statements:
 (I) A is fourth from the left end; M is second to the right of A; and R is second from the left end.
 (II) M is fourth from the right end; only two people Stand between M and B.

Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.

Statement I: Classical Indian logicians (Naiyāyikas) define Upamāna (Comparison) as the cognition of the new object through similarity, known by another means of cognition. 

Statement II: Naiyāyikas consider upamāna as a type of inductive reasoning and therefore view it as a type of inference (anumāna) only.