Below are given statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some cars are trees.
All trees are trucks.
All trucks are tyres.
Conclusions:
I. Some tyres are cars
II. All trees are tyres.

Directions : In each of the questions below are given four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement:
1. All children are students.
2. All students are players.
Conclusion:
I. All cricketers are students.
II. All children are players.

Directions: In each question of below are two / three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I  and II . You have to take the two / three given statements. to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer
(1) If only conclusion I follows
(2) If only conclusion II follows
(3) If either conclusion I or conclusion II follows
(4) If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
(5) If both conclusion I and conclusion II follow 

Statements:
Some planets are stars.
Some orbits are stars.
Conclusions:
I . No orbit is a planet.
II . Atleast some stars are planets. 

Direction: In each of the following questions, two statements are given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly /known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follow from the given statements.

Statements: 

I. Some papers are pens. 

II. All the pencils are pens 

Conclusion: 

I. Some pen are pencils. 

II. Some pens are papers. 

Statement: 

Is paying ransom tow agreeing to the conditions of kidnappers of political figures, a proper course of action? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, The victims must be saved at all cost 

II. No, It encourages the kidnappers to continue their sinister activities. 

DIRECTIONS: In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusion numbered I and II. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements:
Some teaspoons are glasses.
All teddies are teaspoons.
Conclusions:
I.   Some teddies are glasses.
II. Some glasses are teddies.

Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
statement: 
Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India?
Arguments: 
I. No, this will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.
II. Yes, this will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time. 

Direction: In each question given below two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows.Statement:
X wants to eat toffee.
All boys want to eat toffee.
Conclusions:
I. X is a boy.
II. X likes toffee.