Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Give answer 
( a ) if only argument I is strong.
( b ) if only argument II is strong.
( C ) if either I or II is strong.
( d ) if neither I nor II is strong.
( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement: 
 Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?
 Arguments:
 I. Yes, trappers are making a lot of money.
 II. No, bans on hunting and trapping are not effective. 

Direction: In these questions, relationship between different elements is shown in the statements. These statements are followed by two conclusions.  
 Mark answer
A) If only conclusion I follows.
B) If only conclusion II follows.
C) If either conclusion I or II follows.
D) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
E) If both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements: S >R, Y = X < Z, S < Y

Conclusions: I. Y > R II. R > Z

Here a statement is followed by two arguments 1 and 2. You have to decide which argument is a 'strong argument' and which is a 'weak argument'. Give Answer –

Statement: Should student union elections be banned in universities?

Argument 

1. Yes, it will be helpful in creating an academic environment in the universities.

2. No, we will not get any politicians in future.

Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully and select which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the 8 statement(s).
Statement: Sound is produced when something. Vibrates. The vibrating body causes the medium around it to vibrate.
Conclusions:
I. By medium, they mean only Air.
II. Sound is produced by vibration.

Statement:

Please do not use lift while going down - an instruction on the top floor of a five-storey building.

Assumptions:

I. While going down, the lift is unable to carry any load.

II. Provision of lift is a matter of facility and not of right.

Direction: - In each question given below four statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the four statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read the conclusions and decide which logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts:

1. If only conclusion I follows.
 2. If only conclusion II follows.
 3. If either conclusion I or II follows.
 4. If neither conclusion I nor II follows.
 5. If both conclusions I and II follow.

Statements:
Some logic are right. Some right are left
No left is grace. All grace are beauty
Conclusions:
(I) All beauty being right is a possibility
(II) Some right are not grace 

Statement: 

The government has decided to disinvest large chunk of its equity in select public sector undertakings for a better fiscal management.

Assumptions:

I. The amount generated out of the disinvestment process may reduce sub statically the mounting fiscal deficits.

II. There will be enough demand in the market for the shares of these under takings.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give answer 

( a ) if only argument I is strong. 

( b ) if only argument II is strong. 

( c) if either I or II is strong. 

( d ) if neither I nor II is strong. 

( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement 

Should persons convicted of criminal offenses in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?

Arguments 

I. No, such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country. 

II. Yes, it is democracy let people decide whom to vote.